Overview

UNIT OF SUSTAINABILITY, INDUSTRIAL DYNAMIC & ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

16.7

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

66.6 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

75.7 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is moderate, 66.6%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

UNIT OF SUSTAINABILITY, INDUSTRIAL DYNAMIC & ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 10.2 3.2 7.2 9.3 11.7 9.5 10.4 61.6 67.9% 0.9
Article, other NA NA 0.8 NA NA NA NA 0.8 100.0% 1.0
Conference paper, peer review 1.9 1.6 1.0 5.1 1.1 1.8 0.4 12.9 60.2% 0.2
Conference paper, other 4.0 0.7 0.8 2.7 4.1 3.1 1.5 16.9 0.0% 0.0
Book NA 0.2 0.6 NA NA 1.0 NA 1.8 0.0% 0.1
Anthology (editor) 0.5 2.0 NA NA NA NA NA 2.5 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book 4.3 1.0 2.0 1.3 5.5 3.2 3.2 20.5 4.9% 0.2
Proceeding (editor) 2.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.0 0.0% 0.0
Report NA NA 1.0 2.1 2.8 0.6 0.2 6.8 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis NA 2.0 NA 1.0 NA NA 1.0 4.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 17 8 14 19 25 28 22 133 71.4% 1
Article, other NA NA 3 NA NA NA NA 3 100.0% 1
Conference paper, peer review 5 5 3 9 2 6 2 32 59.4% 0
Conference paper, other 9 2 2 5 7 7 2 34 0.0% 0
Book NA 1 2 NA NA 1 NA 4 0.0% 0
Anthology (editor) 1 2 NA NA NA NA NA 3 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 6 2 4 3 6 5 5 31 3.2% 0
Proceeding (editor) 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 0.0% 0
Report NA NA 2 4 4 2 1 13 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis NA 2 NA 1 NA NA 1 4 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

UNIT OF SUSTAINABILITY, INDUSTRIAL DYNAMIC & ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 6.3 37.3 5.9 1.8 27.6%
2015 3.4 23.3 6.8 1.2 36.6%
2016 6.9 23.2 3.4 2.3 33.7%
2017 8.2 44.9 5.5 3.5 42.5%
2018 8.9 129.7 14.5 2.0 22.4%
Total 33.8 258.5 7.6 10.8 32.0%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 13.2 0.97 0.9 7.0%
2015-2017 13.2 1.02 1.8 13.9%
2016-2018 19.0 1.56 3.4 17.7%
2017-2019 21.4 1.49 3.7 17.2%
Total 34.6 1.29 4.6 13.3%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 9 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 43.8%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 26 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 60.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

UNIT OF SUSTAINABILITY, INDUSTRIAL DYNAMIC & ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 13.2 1.25 4.7 36.1%
2015-2017 13.2 1.12 3.3 24.9%
2016-2018 19.0 1.13 5.2 27.4%
2017-2019 21.4 0.97 4.0 18.6%
2018-2020 24.1 0.96 4.8 20.0%
Total 42.4 1.05 10.2 24.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 26 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 60.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

UNIT OF SUSTAINABILITY, INDUSTRIAL DYNAMIC & ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 28 7 25.0% 16 57.1%
2015-2017 30 9 30.0% 21 70.0%
2016-2018 41 11 26.8% 25 61.0%
2017-2019 52 11 21.2% 31 59.6%
2018-2020 57 12 21.1% 32 56.1%
Total 97 22 22.7% 56 57.7%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 28 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 66.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Spain 14 14 0 0 0 6.4
Russian Federation 16 15 1 0 0 5.3
Italy 9 9 0 0 0 2.4
United Kingdom 8 8 0 0 0 2.4
United States 7 7 0 0 0 2.0
Canada 6 6 0 0 0 1.9
Germany 6 5 1 0 0 1.4
France 4 3 1 0 0 0.6
China 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Ireland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Tanzania 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Palestine 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Hungary 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Technical University of Madrid University Spain 13 13 0 0 0 6.2
Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas University Russian Federation 16 15 1 0 0 5.3
Stockholm Exergi Company Sweden 8 8 0 0 0 4.0
Luleå University of Technology University Sweden 9 9 0 0 0 3.4
Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum Other Sweden 9 9 0 0 0 3.1
Politecnico di Milano University Italy 8 8 0 0 0 2.3
RATIO Institute Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 2.0
Jönköping University College University College Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.5
Russian Academy of Sciences Other Public Russian Federation 4 4 0 0 0 1.4
Simon Fraser University University Canada 4 4 0 0 0 1.3
Blekinge Institute of Technology University College Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.3
Stockholm University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.2
Lund University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.1
University of Bayreuth University Germany 5 4 1 0 0 1.1
Stockholm School of Economics University College Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
IMIT Institute for Management of Innovation and Technology Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
Knowledge Foundation Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
Mälardalen University College University College Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
University of Memphis University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Tsinghua University University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
University of the West of England, Bristol (UWE Bristol) University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Combitech AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Confederation of Swedish Enterprise Other Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Knowledge Foundation (KK-stiftelsen) Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology University Germany 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Linköping University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Copenhagen Business School University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
George Mason University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Indiana University Bloomington University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Lomonosov Moscow State University University Russian Federation 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
London School of Economics and Political Science University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Malmö University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Riksbank Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Swala Gem Traders Ltd Company Tanzania 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Swedish Competition Authority Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Tinbergen Institute Institute Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Université du Québec University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University College Dublin University Ireland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Cape Town University South Africa 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
VU University Amsterdam University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Webster University University Switzerland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
An-Najah National University University Palestine 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Gazprom VNIIGAZ LLC Company Russian Federation 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
HEC Paris University College France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Osaka University University Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Polytechnic University of Valencia (UPV) University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Radford University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Renetech AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University College London University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Manchester University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Maryland, College Park University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Reading University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Technology Sydney University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Victoria University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Warwick University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of London University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Eötvös Loránd University University Hungary 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Rennes 1 University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Trento University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
EMLYON Business School University College France 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration University College Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Research Institute For Industrial Economics Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Syracuse University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Pennsylvania University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) Institute France 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology Institute Russian Federation 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Münster University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

UNIT OF SUSTAINABILITY, INDUSTRIAL DYNAMIC & ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 19 9 1 0 5 3 10 47.4%
2015 8 4 0 0 4 0 4 50.0%
2016 18 9 0 0 8 1 9 50.0%
2017 25 12 4 2 6 0 13 48.0%
2018 22 11 5 4 2 0 11 50.0%
2019 31 15 5 7 3 0 16 48.4%
2020 22 17 7 9 0 1 5 77.3%
Total 145 77 22 22 28 5 68 53.1%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

UNIT OF SUSTAINABILITY, INDUSTRIAL DYNAMIC & ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 10.8 348.1 32.1 1.3 12.3%
2015 2.7 133.0 49.9 0.0 0.0%
2016 7.5 75.2 10.0 1.8 23.3%
2017 7.9 144.0 18.2 0.6 7.4%
2018 9.4 293.1 31.3 0.5 5.3%
2019 9.4 88.5 9.4 2.3 24.1%
2020 9.0 31.9 3.6 1.0 11.5%
Total 56.6 1113.7 19.7 7.5 13.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 6 (full counted) publications with poor Scopus coverage (at least 54.8%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 18.5 1.50 3.3 18.0%
2015-2017 16.2 1.41 1.7 10.3%
2016-2018 22.9 2.25 5.5 24.0%
2017-2019 25.4 2.37 7.2 28.3%
Total 43.9 2.00 10.5 24.0%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 38 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 62.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 18.4 1.72 11.8 64.3%
2015-2017 16.8 1.62 11.4 67.9%
2016-2018 23.1 1.57 15.5 67.1%
2017-2019 26.2 1.47 15.8 60.1%
2018-2020 26.6 1.59 15.7 59.0%
Total 52.9 1.59 32.2 60.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 38 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 62.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 39 2 5.1% 19 48.7%
2015-2017 41 2 4.9% 27 65.9%
2016-2018 56 2 3.6% 34 60.7%
2017-2019 68 0 0.0% 39 57.4%
2018-2020 69 0 0.0% 37 53.6%
Total 128 2 1.6% 70 54.7%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 39 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 67.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row