16.7
66.6 %
75.7 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is moderate, 66.6%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 10.2 | 3.2 | 7.2 | 9.3 | 11.7 | 9.5 | 10.4 | 61.6 | 67.9% | 0.9 |
| Article, other | NA | NA | 0.8 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.8 | 100.0% | 1.0 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 5.1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 12.9 | 60.2% | 0.2 |
| Conference paper, other | 4.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 16.9 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Book | NA | 0.2 | 0.6 | NA | NA | 1.0 | NA | 1.8 | 0.0% | 0.1 |
| Anthology (editor) | 0.5 | 2.0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2.5 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Chapter in book | 4.3 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 20.5 | 4.9% | 0.2 |
| Proceeding (editor) | 2.0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Report | NA | NA | 1.0 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 6.8 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | 2.0 | NA | 1.0 | NA | NA | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 17 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 25 | 28 | 22 | 133 | 71.4% | 1 |
| Article, other | NA | NA | 3 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 3 | 100.0% | 1 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 5 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 32 | 59.4% | 0 |
| Conference paper, other | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 34 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Book | NA | 1 | 2 | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 4 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Anthology (editor) | 1 | 2 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 3 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Chapter in book | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 31 | 3.2% | 0 |
| Proceeding (editor) | 2 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Report | NA | NA | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | 2 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 6.3 | 37.3 | 5.9 | 1.8 | 27.6% |
| 2015 | 3.4 | 23.3 | 6.8 | 1.2 | 36.6% |
| 2016 | 6.9 | 23.2 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 33.7% |
| 2017 | 8.2 | 44.9 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 42.5% |
| 2018 | 8.9 | 129.7 | 14.5 | 2.0 | 22.4% |
| Total | 33.8 | 258.5 | 7.6 | 10.8 | 32.0% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 13.2 | 0.97 | 0.9 | 7.0% |
| 2015-2017 | 13.2 | 1.02 | 1.8 | 13.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 19.0 | 1.56 | 3.4 | 17.7% |
| 2017-2019 | 21.4 | 1.49 | 3.7 | 17.2% |
| Total | 34.6 | 1.29 | 4.6 | 13.3% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 9 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 43.8%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 26 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 60.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 13.2 | 1.25 | 4.7 | 36.1% |
| 2015-2017 | 13.2 | 1.12 | 3.3 | 24.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 19.0 | 1.13 | 5.2 | 27.4% |
| 2017-2019 | 21.4 | 0.97 | 4.0 | 18.6% |
| 2018-2020 | 24.1 | 0.96 | 4.8 | 20.0% |
| Total | 42.4 | 1.05 | 10.2 | 24.0% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 26 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 60.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 28 | 7 | 25.0% | 16 | 57.1% |
| 2015-2017 | 30 | 9 | 30.0% | 21 | 70.0% |
| 2016-2018 | 41 | 11 | 26.8% | 25 | 61.0% |
| 2017-2019 | 52 | 11 | 21.2% | 31 | 59.6% |
| 2018-2020 | 57 | 12 | 21.1% | 32 | 56.1% |
| Total | 97 | 22 | 22.7% | 56 | 57.7% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 28 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 66.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spain | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.4 |
| Russian Federation | 16 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5.3 |
| Italy | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.4 |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.4 |
| United States | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 |
| Canada | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 |
| Germany | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 |
| France | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Denmark | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Ireland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| South Africa | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Tanzania | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Australia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Palestine | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Hungary | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Norway | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical University of Madrid | University | Spain | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.2 |
| Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas | University | Russian Federation | 16 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5.3 |
| Stockholm Exergi | Company | Sweden | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 |
| Luleå University of Technology | University | Sweden | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.4 |
| Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum | Other | Sweden | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.1 |
| Politecnico di Milano | University | Italy | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.3 |
| RATIO | Institute | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 |
| Jönköping University College | University College | Sweden | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| Russian Academy of Sciences | Other Public | Russian Federation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 |
| Simon Fraser University | University | Canada | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 |
| Blekinge Institute of Technology | University College | Sweden | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 |
| Stockholm University | University | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Lund University | University | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| University of Bayreuth | University | Germany | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| Stockholm School of Economics | University College | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) | University | United Kingdom | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| IMIT Institute for Management of Innovation and Technology | Institute | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Knowledge Foundation | Other Public | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Mälardalen University College | University College | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| University of Memphis | University | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Tsinghua University | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| University of the West of England, Bristol (UWE Bristol) | University | United Kingdom | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Combitech AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Confederation of Swedish Enterprise | Other | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Knowledge Foundation (KK-stiftelsen) | Other Public | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Karlsruhe Institute of Technology | University | Germany | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Linköping University | University | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Copenhagen Business School | University | Denmark | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| George Mason University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Indiana University Bloomington | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Lomonosov Moscow State University | University | Russian Federation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| London School of Economics and Political Science | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Malmö University College | University College | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Riksbank | Other Public | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Swala Gem Traders Ltd | Company | Tanzania | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Swedish Competition Authority | Other Public | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Tinbergen Institute | Institute | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Université du Québec | University | Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University College Dublin | University | Ireland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Cape Town | University | South Africa | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| VU University Amsterdam | University | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Webster University | University | Switzerland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| An-Najah National University | University | Palestine | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Gazprom VNIIGAZ LLC | Company | Russian Federation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| HEC Paris | University College | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) | Institute | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Osaka University | University | Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Polytechnic University of Valencia (UPV) | University | Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Radford University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Renetech AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University College London | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Manchester | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Maryland, College Park | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Reading | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Technology Sydney | University | Australia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Victoria | University | Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Warwick | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona | University | Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of London | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Eötvös Loránd University | University | Hungary | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Rennes 1 | University | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Trento | University | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| EMLYON Business School | University College | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration | University College | Norway | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Research Institute For Industrial Economics | Institute | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Syracuse University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Pennsylvania | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) | Institute | France | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology | Institute | Russian Federation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Münster | University | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 47.4% |
| 2015 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 2016 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 25 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 13 | 48.0% |
| 2018 | 22 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 50.0% |
| 2019 | 31 | 15 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 48.4% |
| 2020 | 22 | 17 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 77.3% |
| Total | 145 | 77 | 22 | 22 | 28 | 5 | 68 | 53.1% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 10.8 | 348.1 | 32.1 | 1.3 | 12.3% |
| 2015 | 2.7 | 133.0 | 49.9 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2016 | 7.5 | 75.2 | 10.0 | 1.8 | 23.3% |
| 2017 | 7.9 | 144.0 | 18.2 | 0.6 | 7.4% |
| 2018 | 9.4 | 293.1 | 31.3 | 0.5 | 5.3% |
| 2019 | 9.4 | 88.5 | 9.4 | 2.3 | 24.1% |
| 2020 | 9.0 | 31.9 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 11.5% |
| Total | 56.6 | 1113.7 | 19.7 | 7.5 | 13.2% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 18.5 | 1.50 | 3.3 | 18.0% |
| 2015-2017 | 16.2 | 1.41 | 1.7 | 10.3% |
| 2016-2018 | 22.9 | 2.25 | 5.5 | 24.0% |
| 2017-2019 | 25.4 | 2.37 | 7.2 | 28.3% |
| Total | 43.9 | 2.00 | 10.5 | 24.0% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 38 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 62.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 18.4 | 1.72 | 11.8 | 64.3% |
| 2015-2017 | 16.8 | 1.62 | 11.4 | 67.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 23.1 | 1.57 | 15.5 | 67.1% |
| 2017-2019 | 26.2 | 1.47 | 15.8 | 60.1% |
| 2018-2020 | 26.6 | 1.59 | 15.7 | 59.0% |
| Total | 52.9 | 1.59 | 32.2 | 60.9% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 39 | 2 | 5.1% | 19 | 48.7% |
| 2015-2017 | 41 | 2 | 4.9% | 27 | 65.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 56 | 2 | 3.6% | 34 | 60.7% |
| 2017-2019 | 68 | 0 | 0.0% | 39 | 57.4% |
| 2018-2020 | 69 | 0 | 0.0% | 37 | 53.6% |
| Total | 128 | 2 | 1.6% | 70 | 54.7% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 39 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 67.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
